It's becoming an epidemic...

I want this to stop. Now. I sadly witnessed this last night at the movies. Granted, it was a late movie - on a Sunday night - but, there's still no excuse. This isn't the first I've seen this, either; and I'm sure you've seen it before as well. I've had enough. **[Note that we're just gonna focus on the man's pajama pants, and that the tragedy of that plaid, flannel coat, or the hand-crafted-by-Pocahontas moccasins that look like they've seen a FEW tragedies themselves.]**

First, I'd like to start with a simple definition...

pa·ja·ma (pə-jä'mə, -jām'ə) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. A loose-fitting garment consisting of trousers and a jacket, worn for sleeping or lounging. Often used in the plural.

A-men.

That said, let's focus on the "worn for sleeping or lounging" aspect of that definition. In the picture off to your right, does it appear the man is sleeping or lounging? No. In fact, he's standing at a counter in a movie theater.

He can't sleep there.
He can't lounge there.
Therefore, the pajamas shouldn't be on.

Same applies to wearing them in the supermarket, at a restaurant, in the mall, walking the streets, etc.

It just seems dirty to me because you, naturally, associate wearing pajamas with being in bed. Thus, when you see someone in pajamas you get the impression that they rolled out of bed - walked the streets in their PJ's - and that they will return to bed in the same clothing.

That's nasty.
Why?

Because there are germs out in the world. We may wear our clothing outside, but we change our clothes before we get into bed for a reason: we sit in chairs thousands or millions of others have sat in, brush up against my foreign objects, pick up varies seeds and allergens, etc. And I'm no germophobe, but why would you want to take all that with you to bed at night?

Furthermore, being out in pajamas just screams that you're lazy. Too lazy to work, too lazy to change clothes, too lazy to brush your teeth, wash your @$$, etc. All in all, it's not a good look.

And don't even get me started on wearing slippers in public.


Class dismissed.

Throw Back!

I need to start calling these somethin' else besides "Throw Backs" because I think I have yet to go back before the year 2000 with these. In fact, I think I keep gettin' more recent...

Anyway...

Babyface - The Lonliness

The New Facebook...

...gives users a quantum leap into the future. Literally.

I log on tonight, and decide to view a wall-to-wall conversation between two of my friends, and I was presented with this:



If you haven't noticed it says "The Writings On the Wall" occurred tomorrow.

A glitch? Perhaps. But why would something like "tomorrow" even be coded as a possibility there? Is Facebook trying to get to know us SO well that they're starting to anticipate our actions?


This is exhausting.

Brandy - Piano Man

...Alvin and the Chipmunk style!

I'll admit it this is not the first song I've heard like this. In fact, I'm known to listen to songs by Alvin and his crew on the regular because, well, they're entertaining - and funny.



Those of you unfamiliar with the original can educate yourselves here.

How Stella Got Her Groove Back...

So as an update to the Chris Brown & Rihanna story [which I haven't followed much on here cause its just seems never ending and there are madd rumors] it appears that Chris Brown was having some text sex with his manager, Tina Davis.



Why is Tina referred to as Stella? Because she's 40 years old [or about to be forty], and Chris Brown is 19. [Yes, I know in the real story that Stella's young husband was actually 20 years, but work with me, ok?]

Anyway, the real clincher is that Stella - I mean, Tina Davis and Chris Brown have been "bumping uglies" since Brown was 16 years old.

Yes, Rihanna, I'd be a bit tart too.

Speaking of Rihanna: her song "Take A Bow" was on the radio earlier today, and I honestly couldn't listen to it with a straight face. Since this incident, the song plays a different story in my head. Just listen to it, and you should get the idea too. haha.

Go Humans Go?

If anyone would like to explain this, I'd appreciate it:



What do I think, you ask? I think William Penn is nasty. When you take into account the outcome of eating something high in fiber [like oatmeal], and then add "Go Humans Go" to it - it's rather clear what the true message is.


Shame on you, William. Shame on you .


Furthermore, why is he referring to us as humans? The last time I checked, William Penn was a human himself. Does he think he's some sort of god now because of his ability to help us with our regularity? I refuse.

Hopefully Quaker Oats makes some sort of explanation about these ads soon, because I'd say one is required. [Though I will say they are effective because oatmeal has definitely been on my mind since seeing that!]