Does the End Justify The Means?

Allow me to paint a picture....

You feel under-compensated for your work at your job. You've gone to your employer about a raise, but they're not willing to grant you one at the present time. Therefore, you take it upon yourself to slack off a little at work: you take an extended lunch break, surf the internet, and/or take a few company supplies with you as you leave for the day - feeling somewhat more compensated for your work - but did the end justify the means? Was it right to steal from you're employer just because they weren't giving what you wanted, or should you have found another job?

With that in mind, let's say you're in a relationship and the sex doesn't occur as often as you'd like. Things were good in the beginning, but lately you're beginning realize your partner doesn't share the same sexual appetite as you do. Thus, you've gone to them about your needs, and (s)he has told you that you're not simply getting any more - because (s)he doesn't want it. So what do you do? You require satisfaction...

Buy a toy and handle your own needs?
Find sex outside of the relationship?
End the relationship altogether?

To which can you truthfully say that the end justified the means?

Is it right to satisfy yourself when a toy [or hand] while your partner is around?
[Thus risking your sexual availability when the finally want some.]

Is it right have your sexual desires fulfilled by another - unbeknownst to your partner?
[Do I need to mention the consequences involved with that?]

Is it right to totally break things off because you're not getting enough sex?
[Everything else in the relationship is pretty good, but is lack of sex a good enough reason to end it?]


Which can you handle?


Opinions, please...